Friday, December 18, 2009

St Generator Head Canda

Atheists are nice to me ...


A good Catholic should not be condescending with the "enemy", or watch with sympathy. But I'm not a good Catholic. And this is at least a place to start. It is true that atheists are neither soft nor pleasing to the believers, at best treat us as naive, or even to scoundrels. On the other hand, even the believers when we bring you, know to be really unpleasant. All this concerns the ways, sociology, certain historical facts, but if you scratch these cultural and political scale, what remains of deep, serious, important?
is a fact that modern atheism has lost much of its theoretical power with the end of scientific determinism, and now those who reject all forms of spirituality with indignation nineteenth century the triumphs of reason calling for the candor of Comte, are really 'tenderness. However, there is a class of atheistic arguments that deserve to be taken seriously, it is the provocation of pastafariani or, more strictly, the paradox of the invisible gardener (or tea rose, or others ... ). They argue that God is empty hypothesis, that since there was no pretext of objectivity for the presence of the divine in the world any claim to that effect in the nature of arbitrariness. And then if no one can bring evidence, why prefer a historical religion - Christianity, for example, or Islam - a belief system brought by an unlikely prophet, in which the deity was manifested as a plate of spaghetti from Outer Space? The reasoning is flawless. The life of Jesus, the miracles of the saints, visions of Muhammad ... facts recounted, occurred long ago because he believed? Review, only opinion. And if the review is already far from certain, let alone how much more to the truth (which is the only end to which a believer should strive for).
I think that anyone who reflects on any issue in good faith deserves to be heard because he has something interesting to say. So, what can be interesting to say to me Pastafari a Catholic? The catch: the laity do not like raids in the only form of knowledge which they consider valid. For example, you find it intolerable that deny objective evidence of paleontology to support literal interpretations of the Book of Genesis , and myself. With their arguments and a bit coarse 'approximations, tell us who believe, however, a very important thing: a God who "puts his feet on the plate," is creating a role-play man as a puppet is not only unpleasant, but it is not likely. It is not just a lesson. The prayers of our churches regurgitate calling, are required to everything: health, be doing good business, good luck for us and bad for those we consider enemies ... statues of the Virgin Mary that weep blood at election time, ex-voto, relics, crucifixes they become threatening to wield weapons against "those others" (not to mention those who really wield the weapons and in the name of God over and rivers of blood) .
faith does not impose itself, spirituality is a discovery that takes a hard road in which the only reference must be the truth, ruthlessly eliminating any bias, considering each case in a more objective than do scientists with them, without respect for any authority or teacher. The stakes are too great, if I want is the very meaning of my life I can not be satisfied with a comforting certainty of deception. That's why I can appreciate those who want to show the foolishness of my existential perspective, and willingly accept to be questioned. After all the atheists say to us as believers should not be God, an unlikely superhero whimsical and exuberant much closer to the Olympic to the Source of Being, the god in which we do not believe pastafariani is the same God in whom I believe even . So atheism is the only logical outcome that can have a serious spiritual quest free from bias and influences? Not necessarily. In fact, the modern secular clericalism are suffering from a limiting any possibility of constructive development of their arguments, although the destructive part are partly shared. There are some real limits that are insurmountable dogma on which shatters any possibility of development of non-trivial discussion on spirituality. For example, there is an outdated conception of science, not taking into account the limitations of formal systems, the complexity and indeterminism. Or the tendency to shift the discourse from the theoretical aspects invariably those quotas, such as the misdeeds of the Catholic Church over the centuries, or contradictions which we encounter if we take literally the biblical account of creation, rather than deal with St. Thomas or St. Augustine. But even when the speech is being carried out in the most neutral and fair as possible, there is a fundamental limitation in the atheistic arguments, namely the fact of reducing the entire possibilities of knowledge to a single form. In fact, if we postulate that the only acceptable form of inquiry into the reality is that with which one studies the material phenomena, here we have implicitly admitted that nothing exists outside of this area, so any reasoning on a transcendent level carried out in this way can have no meaning.
We agree that the reality of God can not be included in the universe, but this does not mean that God does not exist, rather than its reality is broader and includes possibly the universe. To know is to align your mind to reality, and create models is not the only way this can happen. After all, is it not true that every day we exercise forms of knowledge (intuitive, emotional ,...) other than rational? Wishing to remain strictly within the rational knowledge, what will be the answer to the question of the existence of the universe? If in fact the material reality necessarily exists, what is the reason for this need? But what if the universe is pure contingency, from its origins in such an arbitrary act? Faced with these questions that mark the limits of a constituent of a scientific survey, the "seeker of truth" perceives an abyss from which space and time emerge as a small rock on a boundless ocean and agree to play the game on roads involve him in person, knowing that the price is that it can no longer be an observer, separate from the rest of reality, and that every aspect of everything that manages to capture something of themselves will be lost.

Friday, November 27, 2009

Sony Sr200p Region Unlock

A lesson from the students (for a new physics)


Usually students who learn from teachers, this is in the respective roles. But sometimes a teacher can learn a lot from his students. For example, I realized that bringing the discussion to the extreme physics, ie without taking anything for granted, I was able to meet the fundamental problem that has a non-physical against the physical. All of us who have studied this subject for years, we have trained in university classrooms and research laboratories we have acquired a language, a system of values, judgments, a conceptual framework within which we move to interpret the world and from which we can not get out. And in the end we are also grateful this frame, because it is one that ensures our specificity than the other, is what makes us recognizable and respected ... is the one that gives us something to eat. A scientist can push his investigation much further, but very difficult to leave the territory of which he gained control at the cost of many sacrifices to get the same level as the man in the street, the generic, confronting him with only the weapons of good sense and elementary logic applied to everyday experience, resisting the temptation to protect himself with the invincible armor of mathematical formalism.
The children are nonspecific, they have acquired certain automatism, especially not have personal interests in the affirmation of a particular form of knowledge and confront the reality with the eyes clear sound that comes from ignorance. Their objections are the most naive and disrespectful, but that is why the most problematic. These objections can be turned off by the overwhelming force of imposing theoretical constructs crystallized, or you can choose to let them grow in an uncontrolled manner to the root of all problems: the relationship that exists between reality and models. Usually, the troublesome chain of questions that the non-specialist blast on the Academy's turn is interrupted by some standard or scholarly dissertation on the Big Bang, speaking of subnuclear particles as objects of experience that everyone should know, hardly an expert will admit the most basic truths about this sort of thing (so basic that perhaps he has forgotten ...): fact no one has seen an elementary particle nor ever will see, the only access we have in that area is based on indirect measurement instruments in turn built on a theory that predicts the existence of those same items that need to detect. Who knows physics from high school or through popular literature imagine an atom as something that has all the basic attributes that must have something (shape, size, etc..) which interacts with an appropriate measuring system is able to detect its existence by the instrument, and who has spent hours of his life in a laboratory knows that everything will be the reality of that atom is a bell curve on screen of an oscilloscope.
leaving students free to exercise the highest degree and in full freedom their critical sense, it invariably comes to the point: what kind of reality is what you study physics books? Seriously what is cited in the experience of daily life? It is able to impose themselves with the same evidence of it or is it a model, a collection of empty self-referential exercises (Such as those of math homework) without any relation to the fundamental structures of human existence? I believe that - shocking in its simplicity - the existence of the mysterious ways of the fundamental level of reality is the only question on which, for a physicist is worth spending a lifetime of research.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

How Much Is The Buffet At The Venecian




are not beautiful, are not strong, are not decisive, not I can love myself, let alone another person.
Maybe it's true I no longer tie myself to someone whose heart is beating.
I do not want to get involved and risk another person with me and for me, why should I?
are cowards.
Maybe now I just take refuge in my class, in the pages to study, in closed spaces, which I think is safe, even if the roof is glass, who cares anyway?
Nothing, not even having my family here, having no reproaches for my silence as in the past months, failing even my cat is watching me, and not having a background, I am becoming a slave of silence takes my breath .
I'm my background? But because there is only so much silence? I hear the beep
washing machine that has not finished, the two clocks whose hands mark the minutes pass and the phone that intermittently tells me a message, read it.
Here now I have also turned off the phone, maybe this time I also cut other wires, which were then thin and that bound me to a person.
Both had to go so, probably.
I wear a shirt that I should not have, with my name written on the back but with a much larger neighbor to a red heart.
I do when I thought I love this shirt, but it was not.
L ' love, we fall trivial in tonight, walking parallel to pain, shame it impalbabile, only that it implies sometimes it is concrete.
Some have tattoos, some people buy tickets, there are those who travel long ago, people still buy gifts for and associated items which may have a dog, a cat, a trilogy, a machine. .. in short assigns values \u200b\u200bmore or less important.
there are those who love, you feel uncomfortable with others who can not wait to embrace the person who says he loves, and keep it close to himself, in short, who is no longer living.
Some snaps off the phone when they know that physical distances are too great to be closed; But sometimes a messaggino makes you smile, a phone call will warm your heart, even if you leave that bitter taste on the lips, and sometimes gives you a certainty ... and it seems that you return time. Other times for
love misunderstandings arise, sometimes the ' love is a misunderstanding .
Then there are other factors which lead me to say Wait a minute, though.
Why are you so cynical? Sometimes for love, or so they believe, we create the objectives and targets to be achieved, sometimes so thanks to him we live, we act, we hope.
live beautiful moments, and some where it seems even to have tachycardia as we are happy.
But in the end love does not die.
It speaks of ' love, you live d' love, there are those who live there speaking, writing, singing .
It 's the undisputed protagonist of too many things, and so I thought.
seems that we live in a future projected that there will never .
Other words thrown in here without effect.
After a pizza too good a movie on the couch, talking about this and that with your neighbor depressed which you do not give a fuck , and hope to finally get up, I find myself again in silence above.
(Even though I was hoping for an evening quite different.)

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Jac Vanek Silicone Wristbands Uk



probably could unleash eternal discussions, definitions and Terrone Polentone .
But I am increasingly aware that there is nothing to be ashamed of, and there is no reason to be angry despite equally by either exaggerating part of the time, with jokes that diventan cute little jokes.
But there are differences, not only in traditional but of mentality, when you say that down was not so narrow-minded, sometimes it makes the whole lump always rumors, for past events and for those exceptions that seem a voglian prove the rule even if they remain isolated cases such as jealousy or possessiveness is not true that they are indicative of the region belong -.- '
Al South was more attached to their own interests and people?
Eccerto North is to altruists are all, in fact vedon people will fall in the street, and it is not urban legends, the compli without lifting a finger, as well as when the person ahead of me at the gate and opens it to me gently whisk in the face although I am full of envelopes, but these things do not label as northern behavior, but as a simple lack of education and respect for human beings in general.
Correct me than the opinions given on the Milanesi Permit slip that the days, people and things on regardless, are not all like that:) almost .
The gossip have created this division in Italy.
traditions there are also different from person to person, let alone from family to family, or neighborhood and neighborhood, city to city, and even more from region to region.
I should make a list of clichés in the end, kind of ...
To the north is a bit 'more civic sense (Compliance with the rules of the road, building maintenance, schedules, punctuality, low voice in public places ...)
While the south is assumed as a priority and put the values \u200b\u200b(family, friendliness, hospitality ...)
not in the North there are not obvious, and I hope I understood that I do not want to offend anyone.
But here are all curmudgeons, down just past the grocery store with a smile on your face and vegetable harvest in the morning in the country has no money, we are slightly more optimistic.
down then you should not tell a week before to warn of an afternoon visit of over 15 minutes maybe, if we do not offend the phone rings at 13 or 23.
The differences are found in many other fields, for example the language (it is under the eyes of all the dialects spoken in the north and south are different, is also different even use that is made of 'Italian ... in the north, you change the words and you become an Italian dialect, while in the south, are used at different times, like the distant past than in the north is used very little ... and ignorance is not!), the climate well, I'm enjoying the beautiful days in Milan, sometimes rare rains in recent days, while down in Catania in Sicily in my general, bad weather also caused several inconveniences ...
I could dare to say that:
Enna and Milan have the same climate. Idem
Palermo and Genoa.

The dispute will continue to be there, but I'd still be by far Terron .

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Is Naturism Illegal On Internet




understand what it is, or say that there is not, start writing again, to live.
Probably the intercom at 5 am is not a good thing: D especially if you come back right at 4 and a half. But
hear from those who did not expect: " Trick or Treat?" is priceless.
reviewed the mess in the kitchen yesterday, I feel lazy today, I am not discouraged already cleaned the whole house, it is certainly not a palace but they deserve every 60sqm care:)
Living alone without rules is not that is rarely pleasant, why not put a price on that silence sometimes annoying at times no, I do not have hours if not those of the lectures, only the color of the sky, the sun (if any) and the early evening I find them whether it's time for lunch or dinner.
Wilde is the companion of my days with The Critic as Artist, you know Wildenonavevauncazzodafare , but it does not matter for this and other ideas ... probably even more confusing.
Sunday when I was living high school was the day of leisure but not for recovery tasks for Monday always overloaded with material, we can say that the last year of maturity that I "studied" here on Sunday.
But now that you spend more than a housewife, I care of myself, and finally not "run" as in the rest of the week between classes and another, between a macchiato and a double espresso afterwards.
are not yet able to return the camera to redo a tour of Milan this that I decided that I will continue to live as a tourist, why do you always manage to grasp issues, places and moments that the Milanese (Worker 99%) did not is, the Milanesi slid on the days with a lightness absurd, are few who live at least the weekend as normal people do not like machines, machines working short, their motto is: "Before the duty, and even then ... duty ... "
received phone calls from Sicily at 7 am, of course, now this day will be pulled up to a whole evening ...

V ita routine ? Mai .

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Japanese Fantasy Rape




Perhaps writing is not all but they do all as on the other hand every single other thing. Those who aspire to write for a living do not always succeed, you write to make sense of their thoughts, we write to communicate, you write with the pen you write with a pencil, is written with the poison, you write much more than pressing the handles of a keyboard you can quickly reach absurd now to even take fingerprints these new electronic devices, you glide your finger to scroll through lists, and then you lose time. Often the time you lost to delete the misspelled word if you have too big fingers is the same as it would not be lost if only instead of writing it talk a little bit more. It also writes to bridge distances and emotional void. I write because I I like to read.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

How Do I Find Out If I Can Own Guns Colorado

The straight line, circle, segment


The two forms of knowledge - discursive and intuitive - are in a simplified geometric definitions. The circumference can not be conceived discursively, however, the segment can not be thought of intuitively. Two segments appropriately compounds are still a segment, the circumference will not tolerate itself. To define the circumference of one concept is needed, the distance (a notion that is closely related to the time). Once it is defined in some way the distance in a set of objects for convenience of representation called "point", the circumference as the figure rises easier than you might think (according to some criterion of simple algorithms). The definition of a circle is implicit and intuitive, it is not discursive reasoning that acts but the pure intuition, there are steps to follow, not a building nor put a point after another. He objected that the compass is "speech" which expresses the circumference, but in fact the compass is already in the circle essence: it is already all contained within the compass to draw the circle action is only a manifestation of something that still has its being already full. How it's different to the discourse segment. Once the two points are given nothing is yet said of the segment. How many different lines can in fact draw between one and the other points? What makes a certain line segment be? Perhaps because it is the shortest? But this would imply the consideration of the totality in the act of all possible lines from one of the two points, in the ordinary a topical non-viable infinite space. The definition of Euclidean straight line is completely unintelligible. It may be related to the direction but the direction is exactly what the lines define. It could also mean that the segment is the only line that joins the two points having a length equal to the distance between two points, but in this case the definition is misplaced: what is that in fact the length of a line? Perhaps the sum of an infinite number of infinitesimal segments of length?
short, straight line and circle are two examples of the different ways of thinking. In developing a circle I can see the form that made so many times I've seen in nature but also turn my attention the pure concept of points equidistant from a center in a collection that may have nothing to do with the usual space, a set in which there is a certain dynamism, at least an embryonic concept of "time" so that you can define a distance. To the right is not so. Only the geometric visualization can help me, but if I try to imagine the sheer idea of \u200b\u200b"right" here is that I lose myself in an extremely structured, with many properties (eg direction) and always lies in the view.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Cervical High And Closed At 7dpo

Light and darkness


I have often wondered the purpose, the end, because of my living space and time. It is not a question of minor, many people are born live and die without ever appear on the brink of meaning. I say 'chasm' because it is not the meaning of anything - abstract or concrete, eternal or temporary, sublime or terrible - outside the subject, but the significance of the subject. The judge in the trial the judge reality, and an acquittal is not granted. Modern thought, by extending the scientific method to conventional wisdom, has found an effective and reassuring solution to this problem in the separation between observer and world, a solution that can be as reassuring to affirm that the harmony of the cosmos is the result of the case without That's why the man feel lost. Then there is one who recognizes the ideals and purpose of life is consecrated to them. Surely a love, an ideal, a faith, a mission can be a convincing end, but it is still the order of operations, a contingent order contingent facts, something that is here and now, but in another time and elsewhere may not be or should be, while I, in my most profound way of being I could not be other than myself without ceasing to be myself ... (Read All)

Sunday, September 20, 2009

What Does The Pinky And Thumb Mean

strange experience ...


ran in the woods. Keeping the mind focused on research (rational) essence of man I figured out how everything we do is immersed in the contingency and also what we call "the character of a person" (ie, the psychological level) is nothing but the manifestation within a particular network of relationships and possibilities, of how being, the possibility of reality, basic structures, or as we call it, that is the deep essence which alone has the right to say "I" and in everything we do is a manifestation. Well, at that time and for a minute, I saw my "I-am", that is the particular way that as my person. It was - I repeat - only a moment before being overwhelmed by emotional drive and rational, but what I saw in that moment was wonderful, to leave you breathless. Do not think I am a very nice person, but rather a level of truth that every human being (and perhaps every living thing, or even any) must be beautiful. If I could see the essence of others as I saw mine, I think I would be projected in a paralyzing state of love and contemplation continues (which is perhaps something similar to what awaits us after death ...). If every man saw himself and every other man at that level of depth, not just automatically cease all forms of violence, exploitation, of distress, but also spontaneously create an intricate web of love, an indivisible whole with unimaginable possibilities.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Cervical Mucus With Brown Tinge

Be-Man


The presence of man in the universe makes actual, internally at this plane of existence, a description of its very existence.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Askynlosing Spondylitis Low Libido

Illusions time


Take a fly ball is the same as running back in time.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Pokemon Onesie Adult Size

Science?


For a reflection (bitter) on science take a cue a result of a recent group of biologists who managed to successfully transfer the genome of a strain of bacteria in yeast cells, has changed and then re-transferred to another bacterium, a method that can be used routinely.
honestly do not agree even to define "science" results like this, unless you both agree (but I'm not) that the word science is no longer associated Scire causas but rather to manipulate reality using the technological opportunities with not-so-hidden purpose of consolidating a certain structure of social relations in which small groups have enormous wealth and power levels.
I will be objected that - even if science has often been used to carry out terrible acts - the results of research, whatever it is, can be used in different ways (A man who invents a knife to cut bread can use it to kill as well) so there is no research to be wrong, but sometimes its use.
I do not agree. For at least three reasons:
- the search is not detached from the rest of human activities and the scientist can not play around with impunity with the forces of nature by hiding behind the screen of knowledge as an end in itself, puts the responsibility of any use to engineers and wrong political, especially as research projects often start with the declared intention to create instruments of destruction (the Nobel prizes of the Manhattan Project were a bunch of murderers the same way as the crew Enola Gay);
- just like the one in which we live - based on democracy and a market economy - is not the best of all possible worlds, so the heir to the dominant epistemology of positivism is not the only path to knowledge. I'm very puzzled that 65 years from Schrödinger's essay on "What is life?" yet we continue to apply reductionism in biology in a bovine, disassembling and reassembling living beings as if they were car engines. Clearly, this epistemology is dictated more by the interests of big pharmaceutical companies that pure love of knowledge;
- at least I find it odd that relies on technology to repair damage caused in large part by technology same (global warming, pollution, new forms of labor exploitation ...), it reminds me the story of that night glazier who traveled the country by breaking the windows of the houses with stones ... in the world I would want more than to force nature to achieve its vagaries, we would work hard on himself to find ways to live in harmony within the same nature from which we all come and in whose arms each of us will rest at the end of his journey.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

People With Hiv Usually Get Sick More Often




Everyone knows about (or even saying things interesting), and only a few enlightened know the art of silence.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Coming Up Baby Wishes

The Aphorism Dating of wreck


One night fifty men swam away and drowned by God

the morning after the God forsaken dipped his finger in the ocean
pulled out of fifty souls
and headed Eternity

Gregory Corso

Public Land In Michigan

Nordling, posting ...


"... every meeting is the first meeting and every posting is forever. The meetings and secondments (including birth and death are nothing but special cases) are possible only in time, and we rejoice or mourn just because" us "we are or, rather, we mistakenly identified with the psycho-physical tabernacles and changing our self-assumed, and we believe it to be creatures of time."
Ananda K. Coomaraswamy - Time and Eternity

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Marshmallow Gun Walmart Vancouver

Stories from vegetable meat